Name: Aubri Hanson
City: Enterprise
Send Message
Richard Benedick's J3
|
Wanted another J3 so i sold my c140 to get some cash, found a J3 project in Ponca City, Oklahoma that was built there in 1947 and spent its whole life there working as a sprayer. Started restoration last May and now a year later it is ready to be assembled. Since it was a crop sprayer it still has its dual category registration, restricted and normal. Engine is a C85. I am in the process of making my barn/hangar wider to accommodate the wider wing span. Should be flying soon.Rich
|
|
Jim Kale's Minimax
Please visit the "Member Hangar / Documents" to view Jim's recent inspection results.
Minimax Construction
A few years ago I discovered, at annual inspection time, that I had only flown my Cessna 150 for 40 hours since the previous inspection. I knew that was not enough to be good for the airplane. I began thinking about selling it. At about the same time my old friend Charlie Bell, in Texas was thinking about selling the Minimax project he had been working on for some years. He had decided he was not going to finish it. That helped me make up my mind about selling my Cessna. I sold it and bought Charlie’s Minimax project. I had watched Charlie building on it and I knew the workmanship in the finished wings and tail was absolutely first rate. I needed to build the fuselage when I got it. Charlie had bought almost every option offered for the kit, so all of the parts were there. Charlie had planned to install the ROTAX 447 on it, but I just can’t stand the sound of an engine cruising at 6500 RPM. I was impressed with the ½ Volks Wagon engine ( V W engine that has been sawed in half to make it a 2 cylinder horizontal opposed style) that Jim Goodyear had used on his Hummelbird. I made an inquiry from the person who builds-up those engines and found that several of those engines were in use in Minimax airplanes. I contacted a couple of these people and found that the airplanes performed quite well with the engines. One guy sent me about an hour of video he had shot of his in flights. I made up my mind and ordered the engine. Then I began building the fuselage and modifying it to fit the engine.
Right now (Aug 2012) I am painting the airplane. For many years, Ultralight builders had been using latex paint on their airplanes and have not had problems with it. So I decided to go with acrylic latex. It will give me the texture I want, and just about the right amount of gloss. Not glossy, but not dull either. I chose the WW II PT-19 colors, blue and yellow. Since I registered this airplane as an Experimental Airplane and not a light sport, I decided to use the medium weight fabric and not the light weight fabric that most of the hundreds of previous builders had used. This would have a few benefits. First, I have no weight restriction that most people had when they built their Minimax airplanes to fly under Ultralight Rules. That is the main reason light weight fabric was used on most of them. Second the slightly heavier weight with paint would add a little weight to the tail. This airplane with the ROTAX engine would have come out near the rear of the CG envelope. However, the VW engine is about 20 pound heavier than the Rotax, so my airplane might be just a little nose heavy. The extra fabric weight on the tail will help me with that. Also, I chose to mount the battery behind the seat and not up front so that will also help. Then, of course, there is the fact that the medium weight fabric will be much less susceptible to inadvertent damage in the hangar. Since the airplane had originally been designed for a 25 HP engine, and I was using a 45 HP engine, the little extra weight will not make this airplane seem underpowered. The designer offered all of the engineering data to show that my estimated flight weight will be well within the engineering stress limits for the design. This airplane is designed for plus 4 G’s and negative 2 G’s.
When I modified the engine mounting area for the V W engine, I used drawings from an aeronautical engineer who had decided to mount the V W engine in his airplane. He made the necessary structural modifications to insure the engine mount was well within the design limits for the airframe. After I finished the engine mount area, I was well satisfied that it is plenty strong enough for my airplane.
This engine modification uses an aluminum oil line in the oil pressure system which runs outside the engine and wraps several turns around the intake tubes from the carburetor to the intake valves. This serves both as an oil cooler and a heating source for the air going into the cylinders. However this air is warmed downstream from the carburetor. The engine builder says that carburetor ice has never been a problem, but I was not comfortable with that. I have designed and built a more or less standard (exhaust heat) carburetor heat system that is operated in the normal way with a push/pull knob in the cockpit. I feel much better having that option. This geographical location (warm and humid for much of the year) is an ideal situation for the formation of carburetor ice.
Of course there are a lot of areas where the airplane designer cannot help the builder because of the selection of personal options. The instrument panel is one of those areas. I had decided that I would install a turn needle instrument just in case I ever got into poor visibility inadvertently. Having a gyro instrument would insure that the airplane could be flown without reference to the horizon or ground. However, when I added up the cost of the instruments, it came out to be around 1,100 bucks. I thought about it and decided to go for the DYNON D-10A Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS), which roughly doubled the instrument cost. This is a single instrument that has a color electronic display with attitude indictor, gyro compass, airspeed, altimeter with transponder encoder, rate of climb, G meter and a clock installed in one instrument that is 4 x 5 inches. This saved a lot of instrument panel space. It gave me room to install dual EGT and CHT gages. Designing the instrument panel so that everything will fit (as you guys who have gone thru this drill well know) takes a while.
I had initially decided to use gravity fuel feed from the two wing tanks, to the carburetor mounted under the engine. When I analyzed the flying attitudes, I discovered that in nose high situations with low fuel, the gravity drop distance from the tanks to the carburetor was only about 5 inches. In a nose down attitude with low fuel, the fuel tank feed becomes unported. I was bothered about that and I decided to go for a fuel pump with header tank above the carburetor. The fuel pump feeds into the header tank. When the tank is full, the overflow fuel runs back thru a separate return line to the input of the pump. In normal flying, the header tank is always full with about 7 minutes of fuel in it at normal cruise. If the fuel pump should fail, the fuel should still be drawn to the carburetor by a combination of gravity feed from the header tank to the carburetor and by syphoning from the wing tanks to the header which is just below the wing tanks in level flight. If everything else failed, I would have 7 minutes to find a place to land with the fuel in the header tank. If the fuel pump should fail and block fuel path to the header tank, the system should still work by fuel siphoning with gravity feed thru the unrestricted return line between the header tank and the wing tanks. With my fuel tanks, the pickup lines are at the rear of the tank, so with low fuel and a nose down attitude, the pickup points might be unported. With my header tank, this problem would have to be present for more than 7 minutes before the header tank fuel was exhausted. Holding the nose down for that amount of time would probably cause the airplane to exceed the max airspeed anyway, so I don’t believe that will ever be a problem. I used up some extra time when I could not find a suitable header tank and designed and fabricating my own. I also used up quite a bit of time designing and fabricating the carburetor heat system.
Doing all of the design and building for the options on the airplane has used up a lot of time. I had originally estimated that I could have the airplane completed by Christmas, 2011. As most builders know, the norm is to need more time than estimated rather than less. I did that and now I hope to have it flying sometime late this summer.
Jim Kale
________________
Jan 12, 2013
Big day today, I finally got around to cranking the engine on my Minimax airplane.
The guy who built up the engine had run it for a few minutes prior to shipping it to me a couple of years ago.
I had approached trying to crank it up, with mixed emotions. I really wanted to get it going and fly it, but I knew many homebuilders had problems when they first began to run their engines. I had my fingers crossed when I finally pushed the start button.
I had taken a small plastic squirt bottle with me, put some gasoline in it and squirted some gas into the carburetor and gave it a try.
It fired right up and ran great for about 45 seconds and then quit. I decided it might run better if I turned the fuel shut-off valve to the ON position.
It cranked right back up and ran fine. It has a battery type ignition firing the bottom spark plugs and an aircraft magneto firing the top spark plugs. It ran fine on both ignition systems.
The oil pressure came right up to 45 PSI and stayed there. The Cylinder head temperature guages and the exhaust gas temperature guages seem to work OK.
It was a good feeling to have the thing running with no problems. My instructions called for it to be run about 5 minutes, to get all the parts warm. Then to shut it down and cool it completely down to ambient temperature. I did this 3 times. I set up an electric fan to help it cool down faster so I didn’t have to wait over for over an hour for it to cool completely down. The fan got it cool in 30 minutes or less. The thought behind this is to get all of the new metal parts hot and have them expand and contract a few times so they will learn to run together as a single machine.
Next I will do a few taxi tests to see how the ground handling is, then the big event will come when I fly it for the first time. Since the inspection is complete and I have the homebuilt airworthiness certificate, I don’t have to wait for anything to make the first flight. I can do it when I am ready.
From all of the information I have read over the years, it is best not to schedule this event. That way no one is disappointed if it needs more adjustment or the weather is not optimum. When everything is right, just do it.
That day should come soon.
Jim
Jan 23, 2013
The first lift-off occurred for my homebuilt Minimax airplane N717KE, at about 4:38 PM, yesterday afternoon about 20 minutes prior to sunset. A crosswind had been blowing across the runway late in the afternoon, but as the sun got low, it slowed down to about 2 MPH. I decided to go for it.
Nothing dramatic, I just lifted off, got up to about 10 feet and reduced the throttle a little and settled back down to the runway. The runway at Enterprise is 1 mile long, which, for a such a slow airplane, gives plenty of room to takeoff, fly about 2,000 feet and land with lots of room left. I made 3 flights in this fashion. My highest altitude was never over 50 feet. Caution for such an airplane that has never been flown before is definitely in order. Next time I plan to climb up about 3,000 feet above the airport and just circle the runway. That way if anything goes wrong, I am in a great position to land I will not venture away from the airport until I have over 1 hour on the airplane.
I must say that flying such a light airplane is a nice experience. It flies very well and I like the feel of the controls.
My friend Charles Bell built the wings and tail and then I bought the project and completed it over about 2 years. I can fly into old age with this airplane.
Jim Kale
One of my friends at Enterprise saw me taxiing out for my first taxi test about 15 Nov, and snapped this.
Jerry May's Fokker DR1
I have always dreamed of flying a WWI fighter aircraft. I built several types as a young boy building and flying uncontrolled models. This is my first attempt at building a full size replica. I purchased a set of Ron Sands' Full Size Replica Fokker DR1 Plans several years ago and have finally decided to take the leap.
I purchased a boat load of wood in June of 2012 and have been plugging away at this project a couple of hours a day since then. I have all of the wing ribs complete and am half way through the completion of the wing spars. I will be ordering tubing in the near future and will begin the process of constructing the fuselage.
I expect the project to take several years and a array of new learning objectives on my part, but what the heck...that's why I started it in the first place. So, if anyone is interested in seeing the project up close and personal, just stop by my hanger at Enterprise Airport whenever the door is open and say hello. I usually have a pot of coffee going.
Les Brusse's CX4
|
July 2011 I’ve been working on this project for well over a year and have learned much about lots of things. I started with the spars and center section. The wing main spans are complete, still lacking the ailerons and the tip sections. The framework for the forward fuselage is complete. My scrap pile continues to grow with each mistake, but I am making progress and have just about gotten the fuselage to the point where I can sit in it and begin making airplane noises. Right now, I’m working on the forward lower skin and floor preparatory to installing the controls. Following is a description of building the aft section of the fuselage.
The bulkheads are built from .040 sheet, formed around MDF form blocks. The pieces are laid out on the bench and riveted together. When complete, they are set up on a 2X4 jig and leveled along the top line. Stringers are added and spliced to the forward fuselage longerons. Next, the .020 top skin is fitted, trimmed, drilled, deburred, clecoed and riveted to the bulkheads and stringers. The lower stringers and .020skin is next and gave me the most trouble, yet. I ended up making the skin in three pieces because of the progressively sharper contour toward the rear. By the time I got to the forward end of the aft fuselage, I had to remove the whole thing from the bench so I could get under it to rivet the lower skin to the center section. Rather than try to turn the fuselage over, I made a temporary prop where the tailwheel spring mounts on F11 and just swung it over to a set of sawhorses. The fuselage is now stiff enough to handle in this manner. I’m now working on the forward, lower .032 skins and floor in preparation for mounting the gear and installing the controls.
|
|
Dale Cavin's Nieuport 17
|
In September 1997, my father and I took my radio controlled WW I era models to the Dawn Patrol Rendezvous. This event, held at the Air Force Museum inDayton, OH., is for full scale WW I aircraft replicas, radio controlled WW I models, antique cars, re-enactors and all manor of WW I era displays.For the rest of this discussion, I use the term full scale to mean man carrying aircraft of all sizes. Usually ¾ scale and up.
I have always had a love for airplanes, especially early aircraft. I’ve had my private pilot’s license since 1976. However, this was my first time being around this type of experimental aircraft. There were Fokkers, SPADS, Nieuports, Sopwiths, etc. Some were constructed using similar methods to the originals, and some were made from aluminum tubing riveted together. Many had VW engines, but some had aircraft flat and radial engines.I got the bug real bad, but shook it off telling myself I would never finish one if I started it.I had previously built a car kit and it took me several years.
We went again in 2009. Although I was interested in the full scale projects, I didn’t get the itch. Then for some reason that changed in the fall of 2010.I got the bug again to build a WW I era airplane, but this time couldn’t seem to shake it off.When I told my wife, Rose, she didn’t try to talk me out of it.
The Journey Begins.I decided the only type of project that I had a reasonable hope to complete was an aluminum tube, riveted construction project.For the WW I planes, this boils down primarily to Graham Lee plans and Airdrome Aeroplanes kits.I decided on a full size (rather than 3/4 or 7/8 scale) Nieuport 17.The reasons were that the full size fitmysize, and I have a 1/6thscale Nieuport 17 radio controlled plane that I am quite fond of.I ordered the “plans” from Graham Lee plans and was somewhat shocked by what I received.Being use to modern radio controlled plane plans with lots of detail and photos, the N 17 plans were a thin book of notebook sized sheets with hand drawn sketches and minimal instruction.Hum!At first, I didn’t understand most of what I was looking at. Airdrome Aeroplanes sells kits, a big benefit. They will sell an entire plane kit, or sub-kits.They recommend buying an inexpensive rudder kit, build it and see if you think you can go on.I bought the rudder kit and assembled its structure pretty quickly.I was hooked.
One other benefit of the Airdrome Aeroplanes kit is the option to buy “customer assist” days at their headquarters where they provide a crew to help you build each day you sign up for.I figured this would be a great way to find out how they do things.As a note, this company built four N17 flying planes for the movie “Flyboys” in just 52 days.They also had two of their other planes have quick cameo shots in the movie “Amelia”.
I decided to take advantage of the discount for buying a full kit, and planned that Rose and I would take a vacation to drive our camper to Holden, MO., work on the plane for two days, then haul it all home on a trailer. It turned out to be a great trip, we built the fuselage, stabilizer, elevators, second rudder, and laced the spoke wheels in two days. By the way, the shop at Airdrome is known among those who have been there as the “House of Pain”.
It is all back home as now, but my job has slowed any further progress.I have some additional upgrade parts coming and hope to mount the main and tail gear within the next few weeks.I have also been using this time to collect helpful tools, supplies and read through the plans sheets (including the Graham Lee plans which make a lot more sense now). As for power, I plan to install a 7 cylinder Rotec Radial engine made inAustralia.
Here are a few photos of where the project is as of the end of June 2011.
Dale Cavin, Marianna, FL
|
          |
